Sci-Fi 2010s R 164 min
Blade Runner 2049 (2017) review
A replicant blade runner uncovers a secret that could collapse the distinction between human and manufactured. Patient, beautiful, and uninterested in being a franchise.
Most legacy sequels answer the questions the original left open. Blade Runner 2049 does something rarer: it changes what the original's questions were about, and it does so while keeping the original's tone completely intact.
Expanding the Original's Questions
The original Blade Runner asked whether Deckard was human and whether it mattered. The sequel shifts the frame entirely: its protagonist, K, is unambiguously a replicant, and he knows it. The film is therefore not about discovering one's nature but about living with a manufactured one, and about the difference between being born and being made.
The central revelation — that a replicant gave birth — reframes the entire franchise. It introduces a category the original did not have, and it does so without contradicting anything the original established. That is genuinely difficult, and it is the main reason the film is one of the very few sequels that improves its predecessor's legacy rather than trading on it.
Read more about sci-fi cinema in our Science Fiction genre hub, explore the work of Denis Villeneuve in our directors section, or see where this film lands in best films of the 2010s.
Villeneuve's Patience
The film is 164 minutes long and paced deliberately. Villeneuve allows long stretches with no dialogue, no action, and no obvious narrative movement — K walking through a ruined Las Vegas, K sitting in the rain, K watching a holographic advertisement. This is a commercial risk that a film with a $150 million budget should not have taken, and it is the reason the film feels like an art object rather than a product.
The structure is a detective story that becomes a meditation on identity. K's investigation is genuinely engaging, and the film's decision to make him a secondary figure in someone else's story — a man who discovers he is not the chosen one — is one of the more interesting narrative choices in recent science fiction. The film is about the dignity of being incidental.
Deakins and the Visual System
Roger Deakins won his first Oscar for this, after fourteen nominations, and the win is entirely deserved. The film's colour system is built around amber and grey, with each environment assigned a distinct palette: the protein farm is monochrome ochre, the orphanage is cold grey, Wallace's headquarters is a warm water-filled void, Las Vegas is orange dust. The images are composed with an architectural precision that makes them readable as a visual argument about each location's function.
The production design and the sound design are equally rigorous. The film's sonic landscape is dominated by low-frequency rumble and industrial noise, and Hans Zimmer and Benjamin Wallfisch's score is deliberately closer to a texture than a melody. The effect is that the world feels physically oppressive in a way that the original's Vangelis score did not attempt.
The Wallace Problem and the Length
Jared Leto's Niander Wallace is the film's weakest element. He is a villain with a thesis rather than a character, and his scenes are the only ones where the film explains itself in dialogue. The performance is stylised in a way that sits oddly with the film's otherwise restrained register, and the character's blindness is deployed as symbolism rather than as a lived condition.
The length is also a genuine consideration. The film's middle section is slow enough that some viewers will disengage, and the final act's pacing is more conventional than what precedes it. These are the trade-offs of a film that chose atmosphere over momentum, and reasonable viewers disagree about whether the film earned them. Most of those who finish it consider it the best science fiction film of its decade.
Verdict
A legacy sequel that justifies itself by deepening rather than repeating. Deakins' photography is the best of his career, Gosling's performance is quiet and precise, and the film's decision to make its protagonist incidental is genuinely unusual. Leto's Wallace is a real weak point and the runtime is demanding. Everything else is close to exceptional, and the film's final scene — K lying in the snow as a holographic advertisement plays — is one of the great images of the decade.
What works
- Deakins' photography assigns each location a distinct visual argument
- Expands the original's questions instead of answering them
- Willing to be slow and quiet with a blockbuster budget
What doesn’t
- Leto's Wallace is a thesis rather than a character
- Middle section tests patience
Themes and ideas
- Manufactured vs. born identity
- The dignity of being incidental
- Memory and authenticity
- Whether replicants can love
Frequently asked questions
Do I need to watch the original first?
It helps considerably. The sequel assumes familiarity with the original's world and characters, and Deckard's arc depends entirely on the first film. The plot is followable without it but the emotional payoff is not.
Is Deckard a replicant?
The film deliberately leaves it open, and both Ridley Scott and Harrison Ford have given contradictory answers. Blade Runner 2049 raises the possibility that he is human, which is a significant shift from the original's ambiguity.
How long is the film?
164 minutes. It is one of the longest mainstream science fiction films of the decade and the pacing is deliberately slow.
Did it make money?
No. It earned roughly $260 million worldwide against a production budget of approximately $150 million plus marketing, and was considered a commercial disappointment despite strong reviews.
More science fiction films we have reviewed
Every review is scored and argued. These are the closest films in our collection to Blade Runner 2049.
-
92
Interstellar review
An unusually earnest science-fiction film that treats relativity as a source of grief. When it works it is overwhelming; when it explains itself it st…
★★★★½ 4.7/5
-
94
The Matrix review
A hacker learns his reality is a simulation and spends two hours deciding what to do about it. The action was revolutionary; the ideas were older than…
★★★★½ 4.8/5
-
91
Dune review
The first half of Frank Herbert's novel, adapted with unusual fidelity and an extraordinary sense of scale. Patient, enormous, and confident.
★★★★½ 4.7/5
-
92
Interstellar review
An unusually earnest science-fiction film that treats relativity as a source of grief. When it works it is overwhelming; when it explains itself it st…
★★★★½ 4.7/5
-
91
Dune review
The first half of Frank Herbert's novel, adapted with unusual fidelity and an extraordinary sense of scale. Patient, enormous, and confident.
★★★★½ 4.7/5
-
94
Inception review
A heist film with five simultaneous timelines and an emotional core about mourning. The spectacle is the delivery system; the guilt is the payload.
★★★★½ 4.8/5
About the reviewer
Nadia Brekke joined AJ Movie Reviews after five years covering international cinema for a Scandinavian culture magazine. She writes primarily on animation, science fiction, and non-English-language film, and she has a particular interest in how genre films carry political argument. She has…
A note on this review
This review is based on a full viewing of the film and contains no spoilers beyond what the marketing material reveals. We do not accept payment, gifts, or press trips in exchange for coverage.